| |
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| Critique
du systEme de publication |
|
|
 |
Aarsen L. W. 2012 Are peer-review filters optimal for the progress of science in ecology and evolution? Ideas Ecol. Evol. 5:9-12. |
|
| |
Csada, R. D., P. C. James, and R. H. M. Espie.
1996. The ''file drawer problem'' of non-significant results: does it apply
to biological research? Oikos 76:591-593.
|
|
|
Fisher, J., E. G. Ritchie, and Jan Hanspach. 2012. Academia's obsession with quantity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 473. |
|
|
Grace, J. 2007. "The best papers are
the boldest". Front. Ecol. Envir. 5:49-50. |
|
|
Kokko, H. 1999. What do impact factors tell
us? Trends Ecol. Evol. 14:382-384. |
|
|
Kotiaho, J. S. 1999. Papers vanish in mis-citation
black hole. Nature 398:19. |
|
|
Lawrence, P. A. 2007. The mismeasurement
of science. Current Biol. 17:R583-R585. |
|
|
Leimu, R., and J. Koricheva. 2005. What determines
the citation frequency of ecological papers? Trends Ecol. Evol. 20:28-32. |
|
|
Lortie, C. J., L. W. Aarsen, A. E. Budden,
J. K. Koricheva, R. Leimu, and T. Tregenza. 2007. Publication bias and merit
in ecology. Oikos 116:1247-1253. |
|
|
Paris, G., G. De Leo, P. Menozzi, and M.
Gatto. 1998. Region-based citation bias in science. Nature 396:210. |
|
|
Price, N. C. 1998. What's in a name (or a
number or a date)? Nature 395:538. |
|
| |
Silvertown, J., and K. J. McConway. 1997.
Does "publication bias" lead to biased science? Oikos 79:167-168. |
|
|
Wardle, D. A. 2012 On plummeting manuscript acceptance rates by the main ecological journals and the progress of ecology. Ideas Ecol. Evol. 5: 13-15. |
|
| |
|
|
